Accurate
Country-specific legal content
Drafted with legal expertise for each jurisdiction, far more thorough than AI-generated drafts that copy generic clauses across borders.
BusinessAustralia
Non-Compete Agreement Template
A non-compete agreement restricts a party from competing with a business for a defined period and in a defined area after the end of the relationship. Use our free Australian template to create a reasonable, enforceable restraint that complies with common-law principles and, where applicable, the Restraints of Trade Act 1976 (NSW).
Free to useInstant PDFNo account required
PDF (free) + editable Word (.docx) with Expert
NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT
State Of New South Wales, Australia
EMPLOYER
Harbour Digital Pty Ltd · ABN 12 345 678 901
Level 12, 1 Martin Place, Sydney NSW 2000
By: Sarah J. Mitchell, Chief Executive Officer
RESTRICTED PARTY (EMPLOYEE)
Jack R. Morrison
45 George Street, Sydney NSW 2000
Department: Enterprise Sales
Department: Enterprise Sales
Effective: 25 April 2026
Duration: 12 months · Employee
This Non-Compete Agreement (this "Agreement") is entered into as of 25 April 2026 by and between Harbour Digital Pty Ltd (the "Employer") and Jack R. Morrison (the "Restricted Party"). Important Notice — Australian Restraint of Trade Law: Under the common law restraint of trade doctrine (as applied in Australia following Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt Guns [1894] AC 535 and Australian cases including Peters (WA) Ltd v Petersville Ltd (2001) 205 CLR 126), restrictive covenants must be reasonable in scope, duration, and geography to be enforceable. The Restraints of Trade Act 1976 (NSW) s. 4 allows a NSW court to read down an unreasonable restraint to make it enforceable to the extent it is reasonable, rather than voiding it entirely. The parties agree as follows:
1.
CONSIDERATION
In consideration of the Restricted Party's continued employment with the Employer, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Restricted Party agrees to be bound by the restrictive covenants in this Agreement.
2.
NON-COMPETITION COVENANT
During the Restricted Party's relationship with the Employer and for a period of 12 months following the termination of that relationship for any reason (the "Restraint Period"), the Restricted Party shall not, directly or indirectly, within the geographic area of Sydney Metropolitan Area (the "Restrained Area"):
(a) carry on, be engaged in, or be interested in any business, enterprise, or activity that competes with the Employer's business in the following restricted activities:
Providing enterprise software sales consulting or business development services to companies in the cloud computing and financial technology sectors with annual revenue exceeding 10,000,000 AUD.
(b) assist, advise, or facilitate any person or entity in doing any of the above.
This covenant is intended to apply as a cascading restraint. If any combination of duration and geographic area is unenforceable, the next combination shall apply, pursuant to the Restraints of Trade Act 1976 (NSW) s. 4.
(a) carry on, be engaged in, or be interested in any business, enterprise, or activity that competes with the Employer's business in the following restricted activities:
Providing enterprise software sales consulting or business development services to companies in the cloud computing and financial technology sectors with annual revenue exceeding 10,000,000 AUD.
(b) assist, advise, or facilitate any person or entity in doing any of the above.
This covenant is intended to apply as a cascading restraint. If any combination of duration and geographic area is unenforceable, the next combination shall apply, pursuant to the Restraints of Trade Act 1976 (NSW) s. 4.
3.
NON-SOLICITATION
During the Restraint Period, the Restricted Party shall not, directly or indirectly: (a) solicit, canvas, approach, or accept approaches from any client, customer, or prospective customer of the Employer with whom the Restricted Party had material contact or about whom the Restricted Party obtained confidential information during the course of the relationship; or (b) solicit, induce, recruit, or attempt to hire any employee, contractor, or consultant of the Employer. Australian courts assess non-solicitation clauses using the same reasonableness test as non-competition covenants (Cactus Imaging Pty Ltd v Peters [2006] NSWSC 717). This clause is drafted to be proportionate and enforceable.
4.
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
The Restricted Party acknowledges that during the course of the relationship with the Employer, the Restricted Party has had or will have access to confidential and proprietary information of the Employer, including trade secrets, client lists, pricing strategies, operational processes, and technical know-how. The Restricted Party agrees to: (a) hold all such information in strict confidence both during and after the relationship; (b) not use or disclose confidential information to any third party without the Employer's prior written consent; and (c) return all confidential materials upon termination of the relationship. This obligation continues regardless of how the relationship ends and complements the restraint covenants above.
5.
REASONABLENESS
The Restricted Party acknowledges and agrees that: (a) the restraints in this Agreement are reasonable and necessary to protect the Employer's legitimate business interests, including confidential information, client relationships, and goodwill; (b) the duration, geographic scope, and scope of restricted activities are no broader than reasonably required in the circumstances, assessed at the time of entry into this Agreement; and (c) adequate consideration has been provided. The parties acknowledge that Australian courts apply a reasonableness test to restraint of trade clauses and intend this Agreement to satisfy that test (Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt Guns [1894] AC 535; Buckenara v Hawthorn Football Club Ltd [1988] VR 39).
6.
REMEDIES
The Restricted Party acknowledges that any breach of this Agreement would cause irreparable harm to the Employer for which monetary damages alone would be an inadequate remedy. Accordingly, the Employer shall be entitled to seek urgent interlocutory injunctive relief in any court of competent jurisdiction in Australia without the necessity of posting security or proving actual monetary loss, in addition to any other remedies at law or in equity. In addition, upon any breach of the restraint covenants, the Restricted Party shall pay the Employer the sum of 75,000.00 AUD as liquidated damages. The parties acknowledge that this amount is a genuine pre-estimate of the Employer's likely losses arising from a breach and is not a penalty. Australian courts will only enforce a liquidated damages clause if it is a genuine pre-estimate and not punitive (Ringrow Pty Ltd v BP Australia Pty Ltd (2005) 224 CLR 656).
7.
SEVERABILITY OF RESTRAINTS
If any restraint covenant in this Agreement is found to be unreasonable or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the court is requested to exercise its powers under the Restraints of Trade Act 1976 (NSW) s. 4 to read down or modify the covenant to the minimum extent necessary to render it enforceable. The modified covenant shall be binding on the parties to the fullest extent permitted by law.
8.
FAIR WORK ACT COMPLIANCE
This Agreement is entered into in connection with an employment relationship governed by the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). Nothing in this Agreement is intended to exclude, restrict, or modify any right or entitlement that the Restricted Party has under the National Employment Standards (NES), any applicable Modern Award, or any registered enterprise agreement. In the event of any inconsistency between this Agreement and the Restricted Party's minimum statutory entitlements, those statutory entitlements shall prevail.
9.
GOVERNING LAW
This Agreement is governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New South Wales and, where applicable, the laws of the Commonwealth of Australia, including the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). Any dispute arising under this Agreement shall be resolved exclusively in the courts of the State of New South Wales, and each party hereby submits to the jurisdiction of those courts.
10.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Entire Agreement: This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties regarding restrictive covenants and replaces all prior understandings on these matters. Amendment: No modification is effective unless in writing and signed by both parties. Waiver: Failure to enforce any provision does not constitute a waiver. Assignment: The Employer may assign this Agreement to any successor, acquirer, or purchaser of all or a substantial part of its business. Electronic Execution: This Agreement may be executed electronically. Electronic signatures are valid under the Electronic Transactions Act 1999 (Cth) and applicable state legislation.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date indicated.
EMPLOYER
Sarah J. Mitchell
Chief Executive Officer
Harbour Digital Pty Ltd
Date: ____________________
RESTRICTED PARTY
Jack R. Morrison
Senior Sales Manager
Date: ____________________
Available as a print-ready PDF or an editable Microsoft Word (.docx) file.
What Is a Non-Compete Agreement?
A non-compete agreement, also known as a restraint of trade clause, is a contractual promise by one party not to engage in activities that compete with another party for a defined period and within a defined geographic area. Non-competes are commonly used to protect employers, buyers of businesses, and franchisors against the loss of customers, trade secrets, and goodwill that the protected party has legitimate interest in preserving.
Australian courts treat restraints of trade as prima facie void and contrary to public policy. A restraint will only be enforced where it is reasonable in the interests of the parties and the public. The leading test was stated by the House of Lords in Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Company [1894] AC 535, which remains the touchstone in Australia. The restraint must go no further than necessary to protect a legitimate business interest — such as confidential information, customer connections, or goodwill.
In New South Wales, the Restraints of Trade Act 1976 (NSW) allows courts to read down an otherwise unreasonable restraint to make it reasonable, a statutory power not available in other states where the common-law severance rules apply. Outside NSW, cascading or ladder clauses are commonly used so that, if the broadest restraint is unenforceable, a narrower version may still operate.
What's Covered in This Template
Our non-compete agreement template is drafted to withstand judicial scrutiny in Australian courts.
Party Details
Legal names, ABNs or ACNs, and registered addresses of the restrained party and the beneficiary.
Legitimate Business Interests
Explicit identification of confidential information, customer connections, and goodwill being protected.
Cascading Restraint Periods
Multiple durations (e.g., 12, 9, 6, 3 months) allowing courts to uphold the longest reasonable period.
Cascading Geographic Areas
Multiple territories (e.g., Australia, state, metropolitan area, suburb) drafted as alternatives.
Scope of Prohibited Activities
Precise definition of competing conduct, including solicitation and business relationships.
Non-Solicitation of Clients
Restriction on soliciting or dealing with specified clients during the restraint period.
Non-Solicitation of Employees
Restriction on poaching employees and contractors of the beneficiary.
Consideration
Clear consideration supporting the restraint — payment, access to information, or goodwill value.
Carve-outs
Permitted activities such as passive investment below a share threshold.
Severability
Standard severance clause and acknowledgement of NSW Restraints of Trade Act 1976 where applicable.
Remedies
Right to seek injunctive relief, damages, and account of profits for breach.
Governing Law and Jurisdiction
Choice of governing state and courts with jurisdiction over disputes.
How to Create a Non-Compete Agreement
Follow these steps to produce a reasonable, enforceable restraint in minutes.
- 1
Identify the Legitimate Interest
Clearly articulate the confidential information, customer connections, or goodwill being protected.
- 2
Enter Party Details
Provide legal names, ABNs or ACNs, and registered addresses of both parties.
- 3
Define Cascading Restraints
Set multiple restraint periods and geographic areas as independent alternatives.
- 4
Add Non-Solicitation Clauses
Specify clients and employees covered by the non-solicitation obligations.
- 5
Review and Download
Check consideration, governing state, and severability terms, then download the PDF.
Why Doxuno documents are different
Four things that make our templates more thorough than AI-generated drafts and more current than static template libraries.
Always current
Always current with the law
Templates carrying statute references are continuously updated as the law changes. Your document always reflects the current legal framework.
Free PDF
Print-ready PDF
Free to download. Vector text, embedded fonts, statute citations baked in. Print, sign, file. Ready for any signing flow including electronic signature.
Word · .docx
Editable Word (.docx)
Continue editing in Word after download. Add custom clauses, reuse the template for similar agreements, or share with a colleague for collaborative review.
Requires Expert one-time unlock or any paid Doxuno subscription.
Legal Considerations
The enforceability of a non-compete agreement depends on reasonableness and legitimate business interest.
This template is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Restraint of trade litigation is highly fact-specific — obtain legal advice before relying on a restraint.
Reviewed for Australian law
Common Law Test of Reasonableness
Australian courts apply the test from Nordenfelt v Maxim Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Company [1894] AC 535, as applied in cases such as Lindner v Murdock's Garage (1950) 83 CLR 628 and Woolworths Ltd v Olson (2004) 63 NSWLR 134. A restraint is enforceable only if it protects a legitimate interest (confidential information, customer connection, or goodwill), is reasonable in duration, area, and scope of activities, and is not contrary to the public interest.
Restraints of Trade Act 1976 (NSW)
Section 4 of the Restraints of Trade Act 1976 (NSW) empowers courts to read down an unreasonable restraint to the extent necessary to make it reasonable. This is a powerful statutory tool unique to NSW. In other states, courts apply the common-law blue-pencil rule, which only allows severance of distinct promises, making cascading drafting essential.
Consideration and Timing
A restraint given after employment has commenced requires fresh consideration — something beyond continued employment — to be enforceable. A restraint in an initial employment contract or business sale is usually supported by adequate consideration inherent in the transaction.
Remedies for Breach
Breach typically attracts interlocutory injunctions under the Federal Court Rules 2011 or state Supreme Court rules, damages for loss of goodwill or business, and, in appropriate cases, an account of profits. Courts may also order the delivery up or destruction of confidential materials taken during the employment.
Frequently Asked Questions
Create Your Non-Compete Now
Protect your business interests with a professionally drafted, enforceable non-compete agreement. Fill in the details and download a PDF in minutes.
Free PDF · Editable Word with Expert · No account required