Doxuno
GDPRUnited Kingdom

Free UK Joint Controller Agreement Template (Art 26 UK GDPR)

A Joint Controller Agreement is the Article 26 UK GDPR arrangement between two or more controllers who jointly determine the purposes and means of processing personal data. It is distinct from a Data Processing Agreement (Article 28 — controller-to-processor) and from a Data Sharing Agreement (controller-to-controller where each acts independently). Use our free UK template to record the joint determination, allocate Article 13/14 transparency and Articles 15-22 data subject rights between the parties, coordinate Article 33 breach notification within the 72-hour ICO window, run Article 35 DPIAs, manage international transfers under the IDTA, the UK Addendum or the UK-US Data Bridge with the post-DUAA 2025 "data protection test", and (from 5 February 2026) address the new Article 22A-22D automated decision-making safeguards inserted by Part 5 of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025. The essence of the joint controller arrangement is made available to data subjects as Article 26(2) UK GDPR requires.

Free to useInstant PDFNo account required

PDF (free) + editable Word (.docx) with Expert

JOINT CONTROLLER AGREEMENT
UK GDPR Article 26  ·  England And Wales  ·  20 July 2026
JOINT CONTROLLER
Northbridge Onboarding Services Ltd
34 King William Street, London, EC4R 9AS
JOINT CONTROLLER
Kestrel Identity Verification Ltd
88 Wood Street, London, EC2V 7RS
UK GDPR Art 26 · DUAA 2025 Part 5 · 2 Joint Controllers
England and Wales · Effective 20 July 2026
This Joint Controller Agreement (the "Agreement") is made on 20 July 2026 between Northbridge Onboarding Services Ltd of 34 King William Street, London, EC4R 9AS (ICO ZA1234567; data protection contact Eleanor F. Caldicott, dpo@northbridge-onboarding.co.uk) (the "First Joint Controller"); Kestrel Identity Verification Ltd of 88 Wood Street, London, EC2V 7RS (ICO ZA7654321; data protection contact Daniel J. Pemberton, privacy@kestrel-iv.co.uk) (the "Second Joint Controller"), together the "Joint Controllers". The Joint Controllers jointly determine the purposes and means of the personal data processing described in clause 2 below and accordingly are joint controllers within the meaning of Article 26 of the UK GDPR (Retained Regulation (EU) 2016/679, as amended by the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025). This Agreement sets out their respective obligations under UK GDPR for the joint processing, allocates responsibilities as between them, and identifies the essence of the arrangement to be made available to data subjects under Article 26(2). Notwithstanding any allocation, each Joint Controller remains responsible for compliance with the UK GDPR in full and joint and several liability may arise for any breach (Fashion ID v Verbraucherzentrale [C-40/17] (CJEU 29 July 2019; UK retained per EUWA 2018 s.3-6)).
1.
DEFINITIONS
"UK GDPR" means Retained Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data, as it has effect as part of UK law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 and as amended by the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025.

"DPA 2018" means the Data Protection Act 2018, as amended.

"DUAA 2025" means the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, with Part 5 main data protection provisions in force from 5 February 2026.

"ICO" means the Information Commissioner's Office, the UK supervisory authority for the purposes of UK GDPR.

"Personal Data", "Processing", "Data Subject", "Controller", "Joint Controllers", "Processor", "Special Category Data", "Data Subject Request", "Personal Data Breach" and "International Transfer" shall each have the meaning given in the UK GDPR.

"Joint Processing" means the processing of Personal Data described in clause 2, jointly determined as to purpose and means by the Joint Controllers.
2.
SUBJECT-MATTER OF THE JOINT PROCESSING
2.1 Joint determination of purpose. The Joint Controllers determine jointly that the Personal Data shall be processed for the following purpose(s): Combined identity verification and ongoing customer due diligence for UK retail-banking onboarding under the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (as amended), including PEP / sanctions screening and ongoing monitoring.

2.2 Joint determination of means. The Joint Controllers determine jointly the means of processing as follows: Document upload and OCR (Northbridge customer-facing UX); biometric liveness, document authenticity check and sanctions / PEP screening against Refinitiv World-Check (Kestrel platform); shared verification result and audit trail stored in Kestrel's ISO 27001 / SOC 2 Type II environment; encrypted API integration over mTLS; UK-only processing and storage.

2.3 Categories of data subjects. The categories of data subjects whose Personal Data is processed are: Prospective and current retail-banking customers of Northbridge's client banks, located in the UK.

2.4 Categories of Personal Data. The categories of Personal Data processed are: Names; date of birth; nationality; UK / EEA identity document images (passport, driving licence, national ID); biometric facial template (transient, deleted on verification result); residential address; sanctions / PEP screening results; verification outcome (pass / refer / fail); audit-trail metadata.

2.5 Special Category Data. The Joint Processing includes Special Category Data under Article 9 UK GDPR. The lawful condition relied upon under Schedule 1 DPA 2018 is: DPA 2018 Schedule 1 Part 2 paragraph 14 (preventing or detecting unlawful acts) for the biometric facial template processing, with the appropriate policy document maintained by both JCs.. The Joint Controllers shall maintain an appropriate policy document where required by DPA 2018 Schedule 1 paragraph 39.
3.
ESSENCE OF THE ARRANGEMENT (ARTICLE 26(2) UK GDPR)
3.1 Made available to data subjects. The essence of this Agreement, as required by Article 26(2) UK GDPR, shall be made available to data subjects via the Joint Controllers' privacy information (whether website privacy notice, layered privacy notice, in-product notice, or other transparency mechanism). The essence is as follows:

Northbridge collects identity documents and personal data from the customer via its onboarding journey and is the customer-facing party for transparency, data subject rights and primary support. Kestrel runs the biometric and screening checks on Northbridge's behalf within the joint determination of purpose, returns the verification outcome, and maintains the joint audit trail. Both Northbridge and Kestrel are responsible for UK GDPR compliance in respect of the Joint Processing; data subjects may exercise their rights against either party.

3.2 Primary point of contact. the First Joint Controller acts as the lead point of contact for data subject enquiries, without prejudice to the data subject's right under Article 26(3) UK GDPR to exercise rights against any Joint Controller. Each Joint Controller shall direct data subject enquiries received by it to the other Joint Controller(s) as needed for effective handling.

3.3 Joint liability acknowledgement. The Joint Controllers acknowledge that under Article 26(3) UK GDPR data subjects may exercise their rights in respect of the Joint Processing against any Joint Controller, irrespective of the internal allocation in this Agreement.
4.
GOVERNING LAW, JURISDICTION AND DURATION
4.1 Governing law. This Agreement, and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with it (including non-contractual disputes), shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales. The parties irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales.

4.2 Duration. This Agreement takes effect on the date set out at the start of this Agreement and shall continue until terminated under clause 9.
5.
DATA SUBJECT RIGHTS HANDLING
5.1 Allocation of handling. The Lead Joint Controller (the First Joint Controller) centralises all Data Subject Requests. Other Joint Controllers receiving a request shall forward it to the Lead Joint Controller within the timeframe at clause 5.2 below. The Lead Joint Controller coordinates the response in consultation with the other JCs.

5.2 Internal information flow. When a Joint Controller receives a Data Subject Request relating to the Joint Processing it shall notify the other Joint Controllers within three (3) working days of receipt, furnishing all information reasonably required for response.

5.3 Response time. Data Subject Requests shall be responded to within one (1) month from receipt, in accordance with Article 12(3) UK GDPR.

5.4 Scope of rights covered. The rights to be handled jointly include: information (Arts 13-14), access (Art 15), rectification (Art 16), erasure (Art 17), restriction (Art 18), data portability (Art 20), objection (Art 21), automated decision-making (Arts 22 / 22A-22D — DUAA 2025), and complaint to ICO (Art 77).

5.5 Refusal coordination. A Joint Controller shall not unilaterally refuse a Data Subject Request relating to the Joint Processing without first consulting the other Joint Controllers. The refusing JC shall record the reasoned refusal in writing and share with the other JCs.
6.
PERSONAL DATA BREACH COORDINATION
6.1 Lead. the First Joint Controller acts as the breach-coordination lead for all Personal Data Breaches affecting the Joint Processing.

6.2 Internal notification. A Joint Controller that becomes aware of a Personal Data Breach affecting the Joint Processing shall notify the other Joint Controllers in writing within 12 hours of awareness, providing all information then known about the breach.

6.3 ICO notification (Article 33 UK GDPR — 72 hours). The Lead Joint Controller shall, where required by Article 33 UK GDPR, notify the ICO within 72 hours of becoming aware of the Personal Data Breach. The notification is made on behalf of all Joint Controllers as a single notification under the joint-controllership framework. The other Joint Controllers shall provide all information required for the notification within the internal timeframe at clause 6.2.

6.4 Data subject notification (Article 34 UK GDPR). The Lead Joint Controller shall notify all affected data subjects directly under Article 34 UK GDPR where the breach is likely to result in a high risk to their rights and freedoms. The other JCs shall provide all data subject contact information and assist with the notification.

6.5 Breach register. The Joint Controllers shall maintain a single joint register of all Personal Data Breaches affecting the Joint Processing (whether notifiable or not), recording the facts, effects and remedial action taken, as required by Article 33(5) UK GDPR.

6.6 Containment + mitigation. The Joint Controllers shall coordinate immediate containment and mitigation measures. Where a JC is the source of the breach, it shall lead containment subject to the operational reasonableness test in Article 32 UK GDPR.
7.
DPIA, RECORDS OF PROCESSING AND SUB-PROCESSORS
7.1 DPIA (Article 35 UK GDPR). The Joint Controllers acknowledge that the Joint Processing is likely to result in a high risk to data subjects under Article 35(1) UK GDPR. A Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) shall be carried out jointly before the Joint Processing commences, by all Joint Controllers jointly. The DPIA shall include the elements required by Article 35(7) UK GDPR and shall be kept under review.

7.2 Record of processing (Article 30 UK GDPR). The Joint Controllers maintain a shared master Article 30 UK GDPR record of processing activities for the Joint Processing as a single document, jointly updated. Each JC may reference the shared master in its own broader ROPA.. The Joint Controllers acknowledge that the DUAA 2025 may relax certain Article 30 obligations for non-high-risk processing where the controller is an SME; the relaxation does not apply to high-risk Joint Processing.

7.3 Sub-processor coordination. New sub-processors for the Joint Processing require the prior written consent of all Joint Controllers. Consent shall not be unreasonably withheld; objection shall be made on reasoned data-protection grounds within 14 days of notification.

7.4 Sub-processor list. The Joint Controllers shall maintain a shared list of sub-processors used for the Joint Processing, updated within 14 days of any change. The list is made available to data subjects on request as part of the Article 26(2) UK GDPR transparency framework.
8.
INTERNATIONAL TRANSFERS COORDINATION
8.1 Mechanism. No international transfers shall take place. All Personal Data shall be processed and stored within the United Kingdom by all Joint Controllers and any sub-processors.

8.2 Lead party. the First Joint Controller shall lead on the documentation and management of international transfers under the chosen mechanism.

8.3 Data protection test. Where the chosen mechanism requires a destination-country surveillance and access analysis, this shall be conducted by all Joint Controllers jointly. The data protection test (replacing the prior "transfer risk assessment" terminology under DUAA 2025) is conducted in accordance with the ICO's January 2026 updated international transfers guidance.
9.
ADM SAFEGUARDS, AUDIT, INDEMNITY AND TERMINATION
9.1 Automated decision-making (UK GDPR Arts 22A-22D — DUAA 2025). The Joint Processing includes automated decision-making producing legal or similarly significant effects on data subjects within Article 22 UK GDPR. Following the commencement of UK GDPR Articles 22A-22D on 5 February 2026 (inserted by DUAA 2025 Part 5), the Joint Controllers shall coordinate the safeguards required, including: (a) informing data subjects of significant decisions; (b) providing meaningful information about the logic involved; (c) implementing measures to safeguard data subjects' rights, freedoms and legitimate interests including the right to obtain human intervention; (d) recording categories of data used; and (e) providing the data subject with a right to make representations. all Joint Controllers jointly shall implement and document the safeguards.

9.2 Audit rights. Each Joint Controller may audit the others on at least ten (10) business days written notice, no more than once in any twelve-month period (save where required following a Personal Data Breach). The auditing JC bears its own costs; the audited JC bears its own costs.

9.3 Indemnity. Each Joint Controller shall indemnify the others against costs, fines and damages reasonably incurred by them as a result of the indemnifying JC's breach of UK GDPR or of this Agreement. This is the UK market standard for joint controllerships and reflects the proportionate-fault test in Article 82(2) UK GDPR. Nothing in this clause limits or affects Article 82 UK GDPR joint and several liability to data subjects, which the Joint Controllers acknowledge as overriding statute.

9.4 Termination notice. Either Joint Controller may terminate this Agreement (and its participation in the Joint Processing) by giving 6 month(s)' written notice to the other Joint Controllers. Termination by a single JC where there are three or more JCs does not terminate the Agreement as between the remaining JCs, who may continue subject to amended allocation under clause 3.

9.5 Data on termination. On termination, each Joint Controller may retain the Personal Data it directly collected for its own ongoing purposes (subject to its own lawful basis and retention policy). The Joint Processing as such ceases; the data subject's rights as to each JC's retained data continue under that JC's sole-controller obligations.

9.6 Annual review. The Joint Controllers shall jointly review this Agreement annually, covering (a) the Joint Processing description (clause 2); (b) the essence of arrangement (clause 3); (c) DSR handling effectiveness; (d) breach register; (e) DPIA + ROPA currency; (f) international transfers mechanism (including any DUAA-related ICO guidance updates); and (g) ADM safeguards. The review outcome is documented and signed by an authorised representative of each JC.
10.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
10.1 Variation. This Agreement may be varied only by written agreement signed by all Joint Controllers. Variations affecting the essence of arrangement (clause 3) shall be communicated to data subjects via updated privacy information.

10.2 Severance. If any provision is found by any court or competent authority to be invalid, unlawful or unenforceable, that provision shall be deemed not to form part of this Agreement and shall not affect the enforceability of the remainder.

10.3 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when executed shall be an original, but together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Electronic execution (DocuSign, AdobeSign or equivalent) is permitted.

10.4 Third-party rights. Save as expressly provided in this Agreement (including data subjects' Article 26(3) UK GDPR rights), no provision is enforceable under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 by any person who is not a party to it.

10.5 Notices. Notices shall be in writing and delivered by hand, first-class recorded post, or email to the contact details set out in this Agreement (or such other contact details as a Joint Controller may notify in writing).

10.6 Entire agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Joint Controllers in relation to the Joint Processing and supersedes all prior arrangements (oral or written) on the subject matter.
11.
EXECUTION
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Joint Controllers have executed this Agreement on the date set out at the start of this Agreement.
JOINT CONTROLLER
Northbridge Onboarding Services Ltd
Date: ____________________
JOINT CONTROLLER
Kestrel Identity Verification Ltd
Date: ____________________

Available as a print-ready PDF or an editable Microsoft Word (.docx) file.

What Is a UK Joint Controller Agreement?

A Joint Controller Agreement is the Article 26 UK GDPR arrangement between two or more controllers that jointly determine the purposes and means of processing personal data. Joint controllership is a specific UK GDPR concept and is narrower than "controllers exchanging data". It arises only where two or more parties together — not separately — decide WHY personal data is processed (the purpose) and HOW it is processed (the means). The classical examples in UK retained case law are a website operator and a social-media plugin provider co-determining tracking purposes (Fashion ID GmbH v Verbraucherzentrale NRW eV [C-40/17] CJEU 29 July 2019); a Facebook Page admin and Facebook co-determining the Page's audience-insight processing (Wirtschaftsakademie Schleswig-Holstein [C-210/16] CJEU 2018); and the multi-party tracking ecosystem in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 311.

Joint controllers are JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY liable to data subjects under Article 26(3) UK GDPR — a data subject may exercise rights against either joint controller, and either joint controller can be ordered to pay full compensation, regardless of internal allocation. Article 26(2) UK GDPR requires the essence of the arrangement to be made AVAILABLE to data subjects — typically through aligned privacy notices, an Article 13/14 transparency disclosure, or a public-facing summary on each party's website. The Joint Controller Agreement is therefore TWO documents in practice: the internal binding contract between the joint controllers, and the external essence-of-arrangement disclosure made available to data subjects. This template gives you both — the binding agreement and a clean essence summary that can be lifted into each party's privacy notice.

The 2025-26 UK regulatory layer changes the joint controller landscape materially. The Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 received Royal Assent on 19 June 2025; the main data protection provisions in Part 5 came into force on 5 February 2026. The Act introduces (a) a statutory definition of scientific research that affects lawful basis assessment for joint research initiatives; (b) the new "recognised legitimate interests" basis under Article 6(1)(f) UK GDPR; (c) Articles 22A-22D UK GDPR automated decision-making safeguards (replacing the prior Article 22 in part); (d) the new "data protection test" terminology for international transfers (replacing the older transfer risk assessment). UK joint controllers entering arrangements from February 2026 onwards must align with all four — the template covers each through configurable Expert fields and ICO-aligned drafting.

What's Covered in This Template

This UK Article 26 UK GDPR Joint Controller Agreement covers the full arrangement architecture with a Free baseline and an Expert tier covering the DSR / breach / DPIA / international transfer / ADM matrices.

Joint Controllers (up to 3)

Each Joint Controller with name, registered address, ICO registration number, named DPO or contact and contact email.

Joint Determination Statement (Free)

Description of the joint purpose and joint technical and organisational means — the gateway test for joint controllership.

Data Subjects and Data Categories (Free)

Categories of data subjects (website visitors, customers, applicants, patients) and categories of personal data (identifiers, contact, behavioural, transactional).

Special Category Data (Free)

Whether Article 9 special category data is processed and the Schedule 1 DPA 2018 condition relied on (e.g. employment, social protection, health, public interest research).

Allocation Essence (Free)

The Article 26(2) essence of the arrangement — made AVAILABLE to data subjects through aligned privacy notices or a public summary.

Lead Joint Controller (Free)

Primary point of contact for ICO and data subjects, or shared — sets the public-facing posture.

Governing Law + Duration (Free)

England and Wales / Scotland / Northern Ireland with ongoing, fixed-term or project-bound duration.

DSR Handling Model (Expert)

Each Joint Controller handles its own / lead JC centralised / either may handle — addresses the practical question of who responds to a data subject access request, erasure request, etc.

DSR Response Time (Expert)

21 / 30 (UK GDPR default) / extended 60 days; internal information flow 3 / 5 / 7 days between Joint Controllers to coordinate response.

Breach Notification Coordination (Expert)

Internal notification within 6 / 12 / 24 hours; ICO single point of contact at 72 hours; high-risk data subject notification per Article 34; aligned breach register.

DPIA Coordination (Expert)

Article 35 DPIA jointly conducted or each-for-its-own with shared output — recognised as best practice in the ICO Joint Controllers guidance.

ROPA Coordination (Expert)

Article 30 records of processing — single shared ROPA for the joint processing or aligned ROPAs maintained by each party with SME relaxations under DUAA 2025 where activities are not high-risk.

Sub-Processor Coordination (Expert)

Joint sub-processor list; instruction-passing protocol; alignment between each Joint Controller's Article 28 contracts with shared sub-processors.

International Transfers (Expert)

UK Addendum to EU SCCs, full IDTA, UK-US Data Bridge under PCLOB-stabilised Data Privacy Framework, or BCRs — with post-DUAA "data protection test" run jointly.

Article 22A-22D ADM Safeguards (Expert)

Live from 5 February 2026 under DUAA 2025 Part 5 — meaningful human involvement, transparency, contestation, safeguards for solely automated decisions affecting data subjects.

Audit Rights (Expert)

Annual or for-cause audit between Joint Controllers of compliance with the agreement and underlying UK GDPR obligations.

Indemnity Allocation (Expert)

Internal allocation of liability following Article 26(3) joint and several external liability — to align cost with culpability if one Joint Controller is the primary breaching party.

Termination (Expert)

For breach, change of control, cessation of joint processing — with data return or destruction and post-termination transparency update for data subjects.

Public Essence Summary

A clean public-facing summary of the arrangement — Article 26(2) compliant — ready for inclusion in each Joint Controller's privacy notice.

Fashion ID / Wirtschaftsakademie Alignment

Drafted to reflect retained UK case law authority on joint controllership — scope limited to the processing stage the parties jointly determine, not the entire personal-data lifecycle.

How to Create a Joint Controller Agreement

Follow these steps to draft an Article 26 UK GDPR Joint Controller Agreement between two or three controllers in England & Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland.

  1. 1

    Identify the Joint Controllers

    Provide each Joint Controller's name, registered address, ICO registration number, named DPO or data protection contact and contact email.

  2. 2

    Describe the Joint Determination

    Insert the joint purpose (WHY the data is processed) and the joint technical and organisational means (HOW it is processed). Test against Fashion ID / Wirtschaftsakademie criteria — both parties must together determine, not separately.

  3. 3

    Identify the Data

    Insert categories of data subjects and categories of personal data. Tick Article 9 special category data if processed and specify the Schedule 1 DPA 2018 condition.

  4. 4

    Draft the Essence Summary (Free)

    Insert the Article 26(2) essence of the arrangement — this becomes the public-facing summary made available to data subjects through privacy notices.

  5. 5

    Set Lead Joint Controller and Duration

    Pick the lead point of contact for ICO and data subjects (or shared), and the duration of the joint processing (ongoing, fixed-term or project-bound).

  6. 6

    Configure DSR Handling (Expert)

    Pick handling model (each handles own / lead centralised / either may handle), response time (21 / 30 / extended 60 days) and internal information flow (3 / 5 / 7 days).

  7. 7

    Set Breach Coordination (Expert)

    Internal notification window (6 / 12 / 24 hours), ICO single point of contact and high-risk data subject notification mechanism.

  8. 8

    Add DPIA, ROPA and International Transfers (Expert)

    Tick joint DPIA, shared ROPA, and pick the international transfer mechanism (UK Addendum / IDTA / UK-US Data Bridge / BCRs) with the post-DUAA "data protection test".

  9. 9

    Add ADM Safeguards (Expert)

    For solely automated decisions affecting data subjects, tick the new Articles 22A-22D UK GDPR safeguards live from 5 February 2026 under DUAA 2025 Part 5.

  10. 10

    Review and Download

    Preview the Agreement and the public essence summary, then download as a free PDF or, with Expert, an editable Microsoft Word (.docx) for execution by each Joint Controller.

Why Doxuno documents are different

Four things that make our templates more thorough than AI-generated drafts and more current than static template libraries.

Accurate

Country-specific legal content

Drafted with legal expertise for each jurisdiction, far more thorough than AI-generated drafts that copy generic clauses across borders.

Always current

Always current with the law

Templates carrying statute references are continuously updated as the law changes. Your document always reflects the current legal framework.

Free PDF

Print-ready PDF

Free to download. Vector text, embedded fonts, statute citations baked in. Print, sign, file. Ready for any signing flow including electronic signature.

Word · .docx

Editable Word (.docx)

Continue editing in Word after download. Add custom clauses, reuse the template for similar agreements, or share with a colleague for collaborative review.

Requires Expert one-time unlock or any paid Doxuno subscription.

Legal Considerations

UK Joint Controller Agreements sit at the intersection of Article 26 UK GDPR (the joint controllership concept), Articles 13/14 (transparency to data subjects), Articles 15-22 (data subject rights), Articles 33-34 (breach notification), Article 35 (DPIA), Articles 44-49 (international transfers — as amended by DUAA 2025), the new Articles 22A-22D ADM safeguards, and the retained EU case law of Fashion ID and Wirtschaftsakademie. Each must be addressed correctly or the arrangement risks dual ICO enforcement and concurrent data subject claims against both parties.

This template is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. UK joint controller arrangements are highly specialised — for any arrangement involving Article 9 special category data, large-scale processing (10,000+ data subjects), processing of vulnerable groups (children, employees, patients), substantial international transfers, or solely automated decision-making materially affecting data subjects, professional advice from data protection counsel is strongly recommended.

Reviewed for UK GDPR (as amended by DUAA 2025) — England & Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland

Article 26 UK GDPR — Joint Determination and the Essence Requirement

Article 26 UK GDPR applies where TWO OR MORE controllers JOINTLY DETERMINE the purposes and means of processing. The test is functional — the parties must together decide the purpose (WHY) and the means (HOW). Where each party determines its own purposes and only exchanges data with the other, that is controller-to-controller data sharing, not joint controllership. Where one party determines the purposes and means and the other only acts on instructions, that is a controller-processor relationship under Article 28. Article 26(1) requires the joint controllers to determine their respective responsibilities in a TRANSPARENT manner by means of an arrangement (the Joint Controller Agreement); Article 26(2) requires the ESSENCE of the arrangement to be MADE AVAILABLE to the data subject — typically through aligned privacy notices or a public summary. Article 26(3) imposes joint and several liability to data subjects irrespective of internal allocation.

Fashion ID and Wirtschaftsakademie — Scope-of-Joint-Determination Doctrine

The CJEU's pre-Brexit jurisprudence — retained by section 6 of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 and continuing to bind UK courts subject to higher-court departure power — establishes two key principles. Fashion ID GmbH v Verbraucherzentrale NRW eV [C-40/17] (CJEU 29 July 2019) held that joint controllership arises between a website operator and a social-media plugin provider where the website embeds the plugin for marketing purposes that benefit both parties — but the joint controllership is LIMITED to the processing stage the two jointly determine (here, collection and transmission), not the entire personal-data lifecycle. Wirtschaftsakademie Schleswig-Holstein [C-210/16] (CJEU 2018) confirmed Facebook Page admins and Facebook are joint controllers for the Page's audience-insight processing. The template's Joint Determination Statement is the document the parties use to scope joint controllership precisely — preventing accidental over-extension into stages each party handles independently.

Article 26(3) Joint and Several Liability — The Allocation Trap

Under Article 26(3) UK GDPR, a data subject may exercise their rights against EITHER joint controller and obtain full remedy from that controller. Internal allocation between the joint controllers binds the parties to each other, but does NOT bind the data subject or the ICO. This is the allocation trap: a Joint Controller Agreement that meticulously assigns rights and breach responsibility between the parties does not change the public-facing exposure — both remain on the hook to data subjects and the ICO regardless. The Joint Controller Agreement's role is therefore to (a) allocate internal cost and responsibility, (b) require the parties to cooperate operationally, and (c) provide an indemnity from the party that is the primary breaching party. The template builds in the indemnity allocation Expert clause for this reason.

DUAA 2025 Part 5 and the 5 February 2026 Commencement

The Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 received Royal Assent on 19 June 2025. The first provisions commenced on 19-20 August 2025; the main data protection reforms in Part 5 came into force on 5 February 2026; final provisions are expected to commence around June 2026. Part 5 introduces (a) a statutory definition of scientific research; (b) a new "recognised legitimate interests" basis under Article 6(1)(f) UK GDPR; (c) Articles 22A-22D UK GDPR automated decision-making safeguards — replacing the prior Article 22 in part — with explicit transparency, contestation and meaningful-human-involvement requirements; (d) the "data protection test" terminology for international transfers (replacing transfer risk assessment language); (e) SME relaxations on Article 30 records of processing where activities are not high-risk. Joint controllers entering arrangements from 5 February 2026 onwards must align with all five — the template's Expert fields are configured for the DUAA-amended UK GDPR.

International Transfers — IDTA, UK Addendum and the UK-US Data Bridge

Where one or both Joint Controllers transfer personal data outside the UK, an Article 44-49 UK GDPR transfer mechanism is required. The options: (a) UK adequacy under DPA 2018 s.17A — limited to the EU/EEA, Andorra, Argentina, Canada, Faroe Islands, Guernsey, Isle of Man, Israel, Jersey, New Zealand, Switzerland, Uruguay, plus the UK-US Data Bridge extension; (b) UK Addendum to EU SCCs (faster to deploy where the EU SCCs are already in place); (c) full IDTA (UK-specific replacement for EU SCCs, in force 21 March 2022 under DPA 2018 s.119A); (d) BCRs (large groups). The UK-US Data Bridge came into force 12 October 2023 as an extension to the EU-US Data Privacy Framework; the January 2025 PCLOB quorum issue created long-term stability risk for the underlying DPF, so prudent UK-to-US transfers should also have an IDTA / UK Addendum contingency. The post-DUAA "data protection test" replaces the older transfer risk assessment terminology in ICO guidance updated 15 January 2026.

Articles 22A-22D UK GDPR — ADM Safeguards Live 5 February 2026

From 5 February 2026 the original Article 22 UK GDPR (restrictions on solely automated decision-making) has been replaced in significant part by new Articles 22A-22D inserted by Part 5 DUAA 2025. The new regime defines meaningful human involvement more narrowly than the prior law, expressly addresses what counts as a 'significant decision', and prescribes safeguards including: data subject notification of the ADM; an opportunity to make representations and contest the decision; a right to human review; and (where the decision is based on special category data) a stricter lawful-basis test. Joint controllers building or operating ADM systems jointly must allocate responsibility for each safeguard — typically the Lead JC handles transparency and contestation, while each JC remains responsible for human review of decisions originating in its own systems. The Expert template surfaces the ADM regime with explicit configuration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Create Your Joint Controller Agreement Now

Draft a UK Article 26 UK GDPR Joint Controller Agreement (as amended by DUAA 2025) with joint determination, essence-of-arrangement transparency, DSR / breach / DPIA allocation matrix, international transfer coordination and the new Articles 22A-22D ADM safeguards. Fill in the details, preview and download in minutes.

Free PDF · Editable Word with Expert · No account required