Country-specific legal content
Drafted with legal expertise for each jurisdiction, far more thorough than AI-generated drafts that copy generic clauses across borders.
A Joint Controller Agreement is the Article 26 UK GDPR arrangement between two or more controllers who jointly determine the purposes and means of processing personal data. It is distinct from a Data Processing Agreement (Article 28 — controller-to-processor) and from a Data Sharing Agreement (controller-to-controller where each acts independently). Use our free UK template to record the joint determination, allocate Article 13/14 transparency and Articles 15-22 data subject rights between the parties, coordinate Article 33 breach notification within the 72-hour ICO window, run Article 35 DPIAs, manage international transfers under the IDTA, the UK Addendum or the UK-US Data Bridge with the post-DUAA 2025 "data protection test", and (from 5 February 2026) address the new Article 22A-22D automated decision-making safeguards inserted by Part 5 of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025. The essence of the joint controller arrangement is made available to data subjects as Article 26(2) UK GDPR requires.
PDF (free) + editable Word (.docx) with Expert
Available as a print-ready PDF or an editable Microsoft Word (.docx) file.
A Joint Controller Agreement is the Article 26 UK GDPR arrangement between two or more controllers that jointly determine the purposes and means of processing personal data. Joint controllership is a specific UK GDPR concept and is narrower than "controllers exchanging data". It arises only where two or more parties together — not separately — decide WHY personal data is processed (the purpose) and HOW it is processed (the means). The classical examples in UK retained case law are a website operator and a social-media plugin provider co-determining tracking purposes (Fashion ID GmbH v Verbraucherzentrale NRW eV [C-40/17] CJEU 29 July 2019); a Facebook Page admin and Facebook co-determining the Page's audience-insight processing (Wirtschaftsakademie Schleswig-Holstein [C-210/16] CJEU 2018); and the multi-party tracking ecosystem in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 311.
Joint controllers are JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY liable to data subjects under Article 26(3) UK GDPR — a data subject may exercise rights against either joint controller, and either joint controller can be ordered to pay full compensation, regardless of internal allocation. Article 26(2) UK GDPR requires the essence of the arrangement to be made AVAILABLE to data subjects — typically through aligned privacy notices, an Article 13/14 transparency disclosure, or a public-facing summary on each party's website. The Joint Controller Agreement is therefore TWO documents in practice: the internal binding contract between the joint controllers, and the external essence-of-arrangement disclosure made available to data subjects. This template gives you both — the binding agreement and a clean essence summary that can be lifted into each party's privacy notice.
The 2025-26 UK regulatory layer changes the joint controller landscape materially. The Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 received Royal Assent on 19 June 2025; the main data protection provisions in Part 5 came into force on 5 February 2026. The Act introduces (a) a statutory definition of scientific research that affects lawful basis assessment for joint research initiatives; (b) the new "recognised legitimate interests" basis under Article 6(1)(f) UK GDPR; (c) Articles 22A-22D UK GDPR automated decision-making safeguards (replacing the prior Article 22 in part); (d) the new "data protection test" terminology for international transfers (replacing the older transfer risk assessment). UK joint controllers entering arrangements from February 2026 onwards must align with all four — the template covers each through configurable Expert fields and ICO-aligned drafting.
This UK Article 26 UK GDPR Joint Controller Agreement covers the full arrangement architecture with a Free baseline and an Expert tier covering the DSR / breach / DPIA / international transfer / ADM matrices.
Each Joint Controller with name, registered address, ICO registration number, named DPO or contact and contact email.
Description of the joint purpose and joint technical and organisational means — the gateway test for joint controllership.
Categories of data subjects (website visitors, customers, applicants, patients) and categories of personal data (identifiers, contact, behavioural, transactional).
Whether Article 9 special category data is processed and the Schedule 1 DPA 2018 condition relied on (e.g. employment, social protection, health, public interest research).
The Article 26(2) essence of the arrangement — made AVAILABLE to data subjects through aligned privacy notices or a public summary.
Primary point of contact for ICO and data subjects, or shared — sets the public-facing posture.
England and Wales / Scotland / Northern Ireland with ongoing, fixed-term or project-bound duration.
Each Joint Controller handles its own / lead JC centralised / either may handle — addresses the practical question of who responds to a data subject access request, erasure request, etc.
21 / 30 (UK GDPR default) / extended 60 days; internal information flow 3 / 5 / 7 days between Joint Controllers to coordinate response.
Internal notification within 6 / 12 / 24 hours; ICO single point of contact at 72 hours; high-risk data subject notification per Article 34; aligned breach register.
Article 35 DPIA jointly conducted or each-for-its-own with shared output — recognised as best practice in the ICO Joint Controllers guidance.
Article 30 records of processing — single shared ROPA for the joint processing or aligned ROPAs maintained by each party with SME relaxations under DUAA 2025 where activities are not high-risk.
Joint sub-processor list; instruction-passing protocol; alignment between each Joint Controller's Article 28 contracts with shared sub-processors.
UK Addendum to EU SCCs, full IDTA, UK-US Data Bridge under PCLOB-stabilised Data Privacy Framework, or BCRs — with post-DUAA "data protection test" run jointly.
Live from 5 February 2026 under DUAA 2025 Part 5 — meaningful human involvement, transparency, contestation, safeguards for solely automated decisions affecting data subjects.
Annual or for-cause audit between Joint Controllers of compliance with the agreement and underlying UK GDPR obligations.
Internal allocation of liability following Article 26(3) joint and several external liability — to align cost with culpability if one Joint Controller is the primary breaching party.
For breach, change of control, cessation of joint processing — with data return or destruction and post-termination transparency update for data subjects.
A clean public-facing summary of the arrangement — Article 26(2) compliant — ready for inclusion in each Joint Controller's privacy notice.
Drafted to reflect retained UK case law authority on joint controllership — scope limited to the processing stage the parties jointly determine, not the entire personal-data lifecycle.
Follow these steps to draft an Article 26 UK GDPR Joint Controller Agreement between two or three controllers in England & Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland.
Provide each Joint Controller's name, registered address, ICO registration number, named DPO or data protection contact and contact email.
Insert the joint purpose (WHY the data is processed) and the joint technical and organisational means (HOW it is processed). Test against Fashion ID / Wirtschaftsakademie criteria — both parties must together determine, not separately.
Insert categories of data subjects and categories of personal data. Tick Article 9 special category data if processed and specify the Schedule 1 DPA 2018 condition.
Insert the Article 26(2) essence of the arrangement — this becomes the public-facing summary made available to data subjects through privacy notices.
Pick the lead point of contact for ICO and data subjects (or shared), and the duration of the joint processing (ongoing, fixed-term or project-bound).
Pick handling model (each handles own / lead centralised / either may handle), response time (21 / 30 / extended 60 days) and internal information flow (3 / 5 / 7 days).
Internal notification window (6 / 12 / 24 hours), ICO single point of contact and high-risk data subject notification mechanism.
Tick joint DPIA, shared ROPA, and pick the international transfer mechanism (UK Addendum / IDTA / UK-US Data Bridge / BCRs) with the post-DUAA "data protection test".
For solely automated decisions affecting data subjects, tick the new Articles 22A-22D UK GDPR safeguards live from 5 February 2026 under DUAA 2025 Part 5.
Preview the Agreement and the public essence summary, then download as a free PDF or, with Expert, an editable Microsoft Word (.docx) for execution by each Joint Controller.
Four things that make our templates more thorough than AI-generated drafts and more current than static template libraries.
Drafted with legal expertise for each jurisdiction, far more thorough than AI-generated drafts that copy generic clauses across borders.
Templates carrying statute references are continuously updated as the law changes. Your document always reflects the current legal framework.
Free to download. Vector text, embedded fonts, statute citations baked in. Print, sign, file. Ready for any signing flow including electronic signature.
Continue editing in Word after download. Add custom clauses, reuse the template for similar agreements, or share with a colleague for collaborative review.
Requires Expert one-time unlock or any paid Doxuno subscription.
UK Joint Controller Agreements sit at the intersection of Article 26 UK GDPR (the joint controllership concept), Articles 13/14 (transparency to data subjects), Articles 15-22 (data subject rights), Articles 33-34 (breach notification), Article 35 (DPIA), Articles 44-49 (international transfers — as amended by DUAA 2025), the new Articles 22A-22D ADM safeguards, and the retained EU case law of Fashion ID and Wirtschaftsakademie. Each must be addressed correctly or the arrangement risks dual ICO enforcement and concurrent data subject claims against both parties.
This template is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. UK joint controller arrangements are highly specialised — for any arrangement involving Article 9 special category data, large-scale processing (10,000+ data subjects), processing of vulnerable groups (children, employees, patients), substantial international transfers, or solely automated decision-making materially affecting data subjects, professional advice from data protection counsel is strongly recommended.
Reviewed for UK GDPR (as amended by DUAA 2025) — England & Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland
Article 26 UK GDPR applies where TWO OR MORE controllers JOINTLY DETERMINE the purposes and means of processing. The test is functional — the parties must together decide the purpose (WHY) and the means (HOW). Where each party determines its own purposes and only exchanges data with the other, that is controller-to-controller data sharing, not joint controllership. Where one party determines the purposes and means and the other only acts on instructions, that is a controller-processor relationship under Article 28. Article 26(1) requires the joint controllers to determine their respective responsibilities in a TRANSPARENT manner by means of an arrangement (the Joint Controller Agreement); Article 26(2) requires the ESSENCE of the arrangement to be MADE AVAILABLE to the data subject — typically through aligned privacy notices or a public summary. Article 26(3) imposes joint and several liability to data subjects irrespective of internal allocation.
The CJEU's pre-Brexit jurisprudence — retained by section 6 of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 and continuing to bind UK courts subject to higher-court departure power — establishes two key principles. Fashion ID GmbH v Verbraucherzentrale NRW eV [C-40/17] (CJEU 29 July 2019) held that joint controllership arises between a website operator and a social-media plugin provider where the website embeds the plugin for marketing purposes that benefit both parties — but the joint controllership is LIMITED to the processing stage the two jointly determine (here, collection and transmission), not the entire personal-data lifecycle. Wirtschaftsakademie Schleswig-Holstein [C-210/16] (CJEU 2018) confirmed Facebook Page admins and Facebook are joint controllers for the Page's audience-insight processing. The template's Joint Determination Statement is the document the parties use to scope joint controllership precisely — preventing accidental over-extension into stages each party handles independently.
Under Article 26(3) UK GDPR, a data subject may exercise their rights against EITHER joint controller and obtain full remedy from that controller. Internal allocation between the joint controllers binds the parties to each other, but does NOT bind the data subject or the ICO. This is the allocation trap: a Joint Controller Agreement that meticulously assigns rights and breach responsibility between the parties does not change the public-facing exposure — both remain on the hook to data subjects and the ICO regardless. The Joint Controller Agreement's role is therefore to (a) allocate internal cost and responsibility, (b) require the parties to cooperate operationally, and (c) provide an indemnity from the party that is the primary breaching party. The template builds in the indemnity allocation Expert clause for this reason.
The Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 received Royal Assent on 19 June 2025. The first provisions commenced on 19-20 August 2025; the main data protection reforms in Part 5 came into force on 5 February 2026; final provisions are expected to commence around June 2026. Part 5 introduces (a) a statutory definition of scientific research; (b) a new "recognised legitimate interests" basis under Article 6(1)(f) UK GDPR; (c) Articles 22A-22D UK GDPR automated decision-making safeguards — replacing the prior Article 22 in part — with explicit transparency, contestation and meaningful-human-involvement requirements; (d) the "data protection test" terminology for international transfers (replacing transfer risk assessment language); (e) SME relaxations on Article 30 records of processing where activities are not high-risk. Joint controllers entering arrangements from 5 February 2026 onwards must align with all five — the template's Expert fields are configured for the DUAA-amended UK GDPR.
Where one or both Joint Controllers transfer personal data outside the UK, an Article 44-49 UK GDPR transfer mechanism is required. The options: (a) UK adequacy under DPA 2018 s.17A — limited to the EU/EEA, Andorra, Argentina, Canada, Faroe Islands, Guernsey, Isle of Man, Israel, Jersey, New Zealand, Switzerland, Uruguay, plus the UK-US Data Bridge extension; (b) UK Addendum to EU SCCs (faster to deploy where the EU SCCs are already in place); (c) full IDTA (UK-specific replacement for EU SCCs, in force 21 March 2022 under DPA 2018 s.119A); (d) BCRs (large groups). The UK-US Data Bridge came into force 12 October 2023 as an extension to the EU-US Data Privacy Framework; the January 2025 PCLOB quorum issue created long-term stability risk for the underlying DPF, so prudent UK-to-US transfers should also have an IDTA / UK Addendum contingency. The post-DUAA "data protection test" replaces the older transfer risk assessment terminology in ICO guidance updated 15 January 2026.
From 5 February 2026 the original Article 22 UK GDPR (restrictions on solely automated decision-making) has been replaced in significant part by new Articles 22A-22D inserted by Part 5 DUAA 2025. The new regime defines meaningful human involvement more narrowly than the prior law, expressly addresses what counts as a 'significant decision', and prescribes safeguards including: data subject notification of the ADM; an opportunity to make representations and contest the decision; a right to human review; and (where the decision is based on special category data) a stricter lawful-basis test. Joint controllers building or operating ADM systems jointly must allocate responsibility for each safeguard — typically the Lead JC handles transparency and contestation, while each JC remains responsible for human review of decisions originating in its own systems. The Expert template surfaces the ADM regime with explicit configuration.
Draft a UK Article 26 UK GDPR Joint Controller Agreement (as amended by DUAA 2025) with joint determination, essence-of-arrangement transparency, DSR / breach / DPIA allocation matrix, international transfer coordination and the new Articles 22A-22D ADM safeguards. Fill in the details, preview and download in minutes.
Free PDF · Editable Word with Expert · No account required