Country-specific legal content
Drafted with legal expertise for each jurisdiction, far more thorough than AI-generated drafts that copy generic clauses across borders.
A Severance Agreement is a bilateral release of all employment-related claims in exchange for severance consideration. Our free Canadian template is drafted to be enforceable under the Waksdale / Dufault termination-clause framework, satisfies the common-law Bardal reasonable-notice factors, supports the Income Tax Act retiring-allowance and RRSP-rollover treatment under section 60(j.1), and accommodates province-aware Employment Standards Act recitals (including Ontario's separate section 64 severance pay).
PDF (free) + editable Word (.docx) with Expert
Available as a print-ready PDF or an editable Microsoft Word (.docx) file.
A Severance Agreement (sometimes called a Termination and Release Agreement) is a written contract between an employer and a departing employee that records the amount, form and timing of the severance package, and contains a FULL AND FINAL mutual release of all employment-related claims. It is the document that converts the employer's severance consideration into an enforceable release of the employee's statutory and common-law entitlements on termination.
In Canada, employees who are terminated without cause are entitled to (a) statutory notice or pay in lieu under the applicable provincial Employment Standards Act, (b) in Ontario only, separate severance pay under section 64 of the Employment Standards Act, 2000 where the employee has 5+ years of service and the employer has $2.5 million or more in Ontario payroll, and (c) reasonable notice at common law as set out in Bardal v Globe & Mail Ltd. (1960). A well-drafted Severance Agreement discharges all three entitlements in a single binding settlement.
The single largest tax-saving lever is the retiring-allowance treatment under Income Tax Act subsection 248(1). Under paragraph 60(j.1), severance can be partially rolled over to the employee's RRSP without using any available contribution room — $2,000 per year of service before 1996, plus $1,500 per year of service before 1989 where no employer pension contributions vested. For long-service employees this can shelter $20,000 or more from immediate tax. The eligible vs non-eligible portions are reported in T4A Box 66 and Box 67 respectively.
Our Severance Agreement template covers every element a Canadian employment lawyer would expect.
Full legal names, addresses, authorised signatory, position, hire and termination dates, gross annual salary and years of service.
Lump-sum, salary continuance, or combined — with payment method, schedule notes and source-deduction treatment.
Broad release of all wrongful-dismissal, ESA, human-rights, Honda v Keays moral-damages and Wallace-bumps claims, with carve-outs for non-waivable statutory rights.
Confidentiality of Agreement terms and continuing duties, mutual non-disparagement, return of all Employer property within a defined deadline.
Standard ILA acknowledgment — the single strongest defence against later "duress" or "undue influence" set-aside attempts.
Province-aware Employment Standards Act recital, including Ontario's separate section 64 severance pay overlay where applicable.
All four Bardal factors (character of employment, length of service, age at termination, availability of similar employment) recorded as evidence of full discharge.
Frames the Agreement as independent settlement (not enforcement of prior termination clause) — defeats Waksdale and Dufault unenforceability arguments.
Retiring-allowance treatment under ITA s.248(1), eligible-portion rollover under s.60(j.1), T4A Box 66/67 split, source-deduction handling.
Pre-agreed reference letter wording, outplacement budget and provider, benefits continuation period and scope (full / health-dental / health-only).
Optional non-compete (with Shafron v KRG and Ontario ESA s.67.2 carve-out), non-solicit (clients + employees), and mitigation set-off for salary-continuance arrangements.
Follow these steps to prepare an agreement that survives the Waksdale / Dufault scrutiny and remains defensible against future wrongful-dismissal litigation.
Add the applicable Employment Standards Act notice scale (and Ontario s.64 severance pay if applicable) PLUS the common-law Bardal reasonable-notice estimate. Severance packages should usually meet or exceed the higher of the two figures.
Lump-sum = fastest, cleanest exit, no mitigation duty. Salary continuance = preserves cash flow but exposes the employer to mitigation set-off. Combined = mix of both for senior management.
Carve out claims that cannot be waived as a matter of law (WSIB/WorkSafeBC, vested pension, vested stock options, post-Agreement claims). Honda v Keays moral damages and Wallace bumps should both be expressly released.
Confidentiality of the Agreement (the employee shouldn't advertise the settlement), mutual non-disparagement (both sides), and a 14-day return-of-property deadline are all standard.
Treat the severance as a retiring allowance under ITA s.248(1) and calculate the eligible-rollover portion ($2,000 × pre-1996 years + $1,500 × pre-1989 unvested years). For long-service employees this is the single largest tax-saving lever.
A pre-agreed reference letter eliminates the employee's post-termination uncertainty. Outplacement budgets typically range from $3,000 (junior) to $7,000 (senior management). Benefits continuation should usually match the notice / continuance period.
ILA is the single strongest factor in defeating a future set-aside argument based on duress or undue influence. Encourage the employee to obtain ILA before signing, and record the lawyer's name in the Agreement.
Four things that make our templates more thorough than AI-generated drafts and more current than static template libraries.
Drafted with legal expertise for each jurisdiction, far more thorough than AI-generated drafts that copy generic clauses across borders.
Templates carrying statute references are continuously updated as the law changes. Your document always reflects the current legal framework.
Free to download. Vector text, embedded fonts, statute citations baked in. Print, sign, file. Ready for any signing flow including electronic signature.
Continue editing in Word after download. Add custom clauses, reuse the template for similar agreements, or share with a colleague for collaborative review.
Requires Expert one-time unlock or any paid Doxuno subscription.
Severance Agreements are governed by a federal-provincial overlay of statutes and binding Court of Appeal decisions.
This template is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Severance Agreements carry significant financial and tax consequences. Consult a qualified Canadian employment lawyer in your province for advice specific to your situation, particularly where mass terminations, fixed-term contracts, executive packages, retiring-allowance optimisation or non-compete enforcement are at issue.
Reviewed for Canadian federal and common-law-province requirements
Each common-law province sets the statutory floor for termination notice or pay in lieu. Ontario's Employment Standards Act, 2000, sections 54 and 57 establish a 1-to-8-week notice scale; section 61 permits pay in lieu; and section 64 layers a SEPARATE severance-pay entitlement (1 week per year of service to a 26-week maximum under section 65) for employees with 5+ years of service whose employer has $2.5 million or more in Ontario payroll, or has terminated 50+ employees in a 6-month business closure. British Columbia (s.63), Alberta (ss.55-57), Saskatchewan, Manitoba and the other common-law provinces apply analogous notice scales without an Ontario-style section 64 overlay.
Bardal v Globe & Mail Ltd., [1960] O.W.N. 253 set out the four factors for calculating reasonable notice at common law: (i) character of employment, (ii) length of service, (iii) age at termination, and (iv) availability of similar employment, having regard to the employee's experience, training and qualifications. These factors have been applied consistently by Canadian courts since 1960 and remain the leading framework in 2026. Common-law notice almost always exceeds the statutory minimum.
Waksdale v Swegon North America Inc., 2020 ONCA 391 (leave denied [2021] S.C.C.A. No. 213) held that if any termination provision in an employee's employment agreement breaches the Employment Standards Act (even one not relied on for the termination), the termination provisions in their entirety are void and the employee is entitled to reasonable notice at common law — irrespective of any severability clause. Dufault v Ignace (Township), 2024 ONCA 915 reaffirmed and extended Waksdale: clauses that give the employer "sole discretion" to terminate or that terminate "at any time" breach the ESA's protected-leave provisions and void the entire termination framework. Drafting a fresh Severance Agreement (as opposed to enforcing a prior termination clause) sidesteps the Waksdale / Dufault risk entirely.
Honda Canada Inc. v Keays, 2008 SCC 39 established the modern "moderate approach" to damages for mental distress arising from the manner of dismissal — replacing the older Wallace v United Grain Growers, [1997] 3 SCR 701 "Wallace bumps". Where the employer breaches its duty of good faith in the manner of dismissal (deceit, abuse of vulnerability, indifference to known mental distress), the employee is entitled to compensatory damages for the foreseeable mental distress. A properly worded mutual release expressly extinguishes all Honda v Keays and Wallace claims.
Rahman v Cannon Design Architecture Inc., 2022 ONCA 451 confirmed that a sophisticated employee — one who is senior, well-paid and bargaining at arms-length — CAN be bound by an ESA-minimum termination clause where the bargaining circumstances genuinely supported informed consent. Recording the sophisticated-employee acknowledgment in the Severance Agreement materially strengthens its enforceability against later "I didn't understand what I was signing" arguments.
Severance pay is a "retiring allowance" within Income Tax Act subsection 248(1). Under paragraph 60(j.1), the eligible portion (the sum of $2,000 per year of pre-1996 service plus $1,500 per year of pre-1989 service with no vested employer pension contributions) may be transferred directly to the employee's RRSP WITHOUT using available contribution room. The eligible portion is exempt from withholding tax under subsection 153(1) and Regulation 100(3). The non-eligible balance is subject to lump-sum withholding at 10 / 20 / 30 percent depending on gross amount. The eligible portion is reported in T4A Box 66 and the non-eligible portion in T4A Box 67.
Post-employment non-competition restrictions in Canada are presumptively unenforceable. In Ontario, section 67.2 of the Employment Standards Act, 2000 deems them void since 25 October 2021, subject only to executive and sale-of-business carve-outs in section 67.2(2). Non-solicitation restrictions (clients and employees) are more readily enforced, usually up to 12 months. Shafron v KRG Insurance Brokers (Western) Inc., 2009 SCC 6 articulated the strict temporal, geographic and activity reasonableness tests applicable to all post-employment restrictive covenants.
Quebec is governed by the civil-law regime under the Civil Code of Québec and the Act respecting labour standards (CQLR c N-1.1). A separate Quebec-specific severance template will follow in a future sprint.
Build a Waksdale-safe, Bardal-compliant Severance Agreement in minutes. The Free version produces a self-executing release with payment terms, mutual release, continuing obligations and ILA acknowledgment. Upgrade to Expert to add the province-aware ESA + Bardal calculation recital, the Waksdale / Dufault termination-clause acknowledgment, the retiring-allowance and RRSP-rollover schedule with T4A Box 66/67 split, the reference letter / outplacement / benefits-continuation package, and the optional non-compete / non-solicit / mitigation-setoff layer.
Free PDF · Editable Word with Expert · No account required